A living trust is a great way for avoiding probate. But do you actually need one? One of the more general questions concerning estate planning people encounter is if making a will is sufficient, or if it’s wiser to devise a living trust in order to avoid probate. As expected, the answer is, “That remains to be seen.” Many individuals need a living trust without delay, others are going to never need one, and a lot of us fall somewhere in between.
Avoiding Probate Using a Living Trust
First of all, living trusts help you in avoiding probate, but why is avoiding probate essential? Probate is the method in which an individual’s property is cataloged and distributed following their passing. A lot of people strive to avoid probate because it takes a long time and is costly. There is an increasing amount of ways to transfer assets to inheritors free from probate inside of weeks or, at best, months of passing. These comprise of making gifts prior to passing away, including a pay-on-death designation to a financial institution account, holding the home in joint tenancy with right of survivorship with your husband, wife, or partner, and appointing a beneficiary for retirement and life insurance accounts. But only a living trust can be used for all kinds of property, at the same time offering the broad planning adaptability of a will. Using a living trust, for instance, you can appoint alternative beneficiaries to inherit property should your initial beneficiary pass away before you do. That is something you cannot achieve with joint tenancy or a pay-on-death financial institution account.
Downsides to Living Trusts
Living trusts do have their downsides. In comparison to wills, living trusts are significantly more time-consuming to establish, entail more continual maintenance, and are more challenging to alter. A lawyer-devised trust usually costs more than a $1,000, though the cost is going to decrease drastically when you use a self-help device to create your own trust. Additionally, you are still going to need a straightforward will, as a back-up tool, even when you devise a trust.
Is a Living Trust Appropriate for You?
These downsides are outweighed by the benefits for those that have large estates and for those that are likely to pass away in the next 10 or so years. To see if you require a living trust, think about the following factors:
How Old Are You?
Living trusts are often unnecessary for healthy individuals under 55 or 60 with moderate incomes. They offer no benefits during life. A 45-year-old need not worry about probate expenses for many years. A well-crafted will is sufficient for transferring property if an unlikely sudden demise occurs. Moreover, user-friendly probate-avoidance methods, such as designating beneficiaries for securities, have become widely accepted in the last decade and are likely to persist.
How Wealthy Are You?
Beyond age, the primary factor in deciding to establish a living trust is your financial situation. In simple terms, the wealthier you are, the more you can save for heirs by avoiding probate. For instance, a 46-year-old with $11 million might opt for probate avoidance for safety. Conversely, a 44-year-old with $350,000 might reasonably delay creating a trust. The nature of your assets matters too, especially if you own a small business or assets you want to avoid tying up in probate. Even with a low likelihood of sudden passing, you wouldn’t want your executor reporting to a judge for a year or more.
Are You Married?
If you and your spouse plan to leave most property to each other, worrying about probate at a young age is unnecessary. For many couples, jointly owned major assets avoid probate. In cases where probate is necessary, many states offer surviving spouses quicker and cheaper probate alternatives.
Source:
-
Nolo. (2011, October 10). Why you may not need a living trust. www.nolo.com. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/living-trust-need-unnecessary-30260.html